|
Careful Language When singing I am in the habit of changing certain exclusive terms to ones which are some what more inclusive. But in a recent service, with relatively few people in the church, sitting in the front row almost in the shadow of the lectern, I was tempted to give in and "let angels and men rejoice" along with everyone else. After all, who would really care?. And I didn't want my loud vice to embarrass my colleague leading the service.
Then I remembered my nine year old daughter beside me telling me of her hurt.... let me emphasise that.... her hurt, when her school principal, had invited the girls to alter some words of a hymn at school assembly, and it seemed to Debbie that only she had. Debbie had felt it an important thing to do and was hurt that no one else had.
Nine year old girls understand the issue of Careful Language, and feel the hurt of exclusion. Even my five year old son can come home from school with an important letter, telling Mum she has to read it tonight, and say apologetically, "I know it says Mrs. and not Ms. on the outside, but just ignore that."
So as we stood to sing the hymn I abandoned the angels and sang "women and men rejoice." And Debbie talked to me on he way home about "silly hymns" that leave women out. Careful language is not complicated and theoretical feminist whinging, which we can ignore because it really isn't important. Even a child can understand it, and feel the hurt.
I came to an appreciation of the need for careful language through four main areas on my life. I can't get the story in strict sequence and order as it happened, but it goes something like this.
After only a few days at school, I learned the power of words, and remember crying to my parents about the two big girls who were calling me names at the bus stop. As a farmer's kid on a school bus full of army kids, I learned the cost of being different. It didn't help in our school to be the child of a church going family either, and being clever, while it won me some grudging respect, also separated me out. Well before I reached high school, I knew what alienation and exclusion were all about, even if I'd not met the actual words. In a lot of ways school was a pretty miserable experience.
The second thing I learned about was the relativity of social conventions. I went to Ernabella to work for an aboriginal community of people who saw life in vastly different ways to me. I saw workers giving things to their relatives in the store. I had been taught to call that stealing. I learned that there it was fulfilling a social obligation, and wrong not to. Going in the other direction, I learned that Pitjantjatjara people were scandalised by the idea of such caring and respected institutions as Resthaven. Fancy locking up your old people!
When Wendy's parents came to visit accompanied by her younger sister and 86 year old grandfather, the parents slept in on the first day. But grandfather and sister went for a mid morning walk, and our friends all told Wendy, "We saw your Mother and Father!" In that society, so different from our own, it was a fairly logical conclusion on their part ‑‑.... (we never told her sister.)
The relativity of it all was summed up for me by Bible translator Anne Eckert, who grew up in North Carolina, a tobacco growing state. "I can't help notice," she said, "that back home it's a sin to drink, but OK to smoke. But for my husband's relatives in the Barossa, it's OK to drink, and a sin to smoke." At Ernabella I learned that much of what is right and wrong, even in theology, is mostly just cultural definition which we create. I became very suspicious of absolutes.
In Ernabella I also learned about oppression. (This is the third area.) I met some of the survivors of the white massacres. I learned the devastating effects of the desecration of sacred sites. I found the stock yards of the white cattlemen five and ten miles inside aboriginal land. I walked the miles of boundary fence where it had been shifted away from the state border arbitrarily annexing aboriginal waterholes. I met thieving, racist whites who were supposedly helping aboriginal people, and was confronted by my own racism. In Alice Springs, I met a deep and bitter racism, and saw aboriginal and white alike living in fear.
And when I came home on holidays I found I needed to be a missionary for aboriginal people in our own churches, which are often deeply racist. These people sincerely espouse the same oppressive attitudes as the cattlemen, and the townspeople of Alice Springs. Starting from its culturally derived theology, and giving it divine status, instead looking first at what is really happening, the church itself can be oppressive.
The fourth significant area is this: Paradoxically, in the midst of the Ernabella experience, I was also a thorough-going Fundamentalist. It was a theology which had promised answers I needed in life, although I soon found it was in deep contradiction to the way I thought Christians should live out their faith.
I found fundamentalism was strangling my sense of God. Increasingly I found it philosophically and theologically defective... to say the least! And I began to see it deeply dehumanising of women, especially Wendy, to whom I am married. It took me three years hard work to get out of it; fundamentalism lets you in easy, but you have to risk losing God to get out.
Fundamentalism taught me a lot. As I escaped, and as I encountered the deep culture shock of returning to the city after six years in the desert, I began to see something. I began to see that its deep oppression and hatred of women, really only was a distillation and refinement of what was an oppression generally widespread in society and the church. And finally I could put a name to the pain and suffering of my mum and sister which I had never understood as a child.
At that time, nine or so years ago even the theological college, allegedly a hotbed of liberalism and wayward feminist thought, was still basically assuming wives always looked after minister's children, and that wives were always on call for hubby. In practice, despite what was often said, it seemed college demanded wives come last in priority. And the college was far more liberated than many congregations.
I was torn between study, and wife, and God. I wrote in my journal on one occasion that either college would destroy Wendy, and our marriage, or I had to leave. Being true to her, and to the theology the college itself had taught me, meant I took an extra two years to finish.
Careful Language: So, in college, with my own childhood experiences of alienation, the vivid experiences from Ernabella, and the experience of fundamentalism, I met the terms "sexist language," and "inclusive language." Initially I was scornful. Then I recognised in the stories of the women and men whom I read, the same feelings of alienation and exclusion I had known so well for most of my life. I realised these people were talking about real experiences similar to mine. I saw the hurt of the women of the church who were my friends.
The neat rational arguments against exclusive language based on the need for purity of grammar, and the order of creation, and all that stuff, would once have impressed me. But my experience of how so many things are not from God, but constructed by our culture, meant such arguments lost their sting. There was a kind of crossing of a divide... so that I saw the world quite differently. My own intuitive suspicion of absolutes, their "man-made" (sic) nature, and their ability to be oppressive, was founded in unforgettable experience. This intuition was strongly reinforced in my studies. This was especially so as I wrote a major essay on inclusive language for Dr D'Arcy Wood, and discovered how much more inclusive our English language had once been.
That essay was a watershed experience for me. (For one thing I began to suspect I was less conservative than some of my lecturers; that's a truly frightening experience for an ex-fundo!) But, more seriously, I saw very clearly how what I had begun to suspect was true: the very words we use impinge upon people for good or bad, the very words... quite apart from whatever argument we might be attempting to construct.
The essay was also the opening of a floodgate, beginning my exposure to a broad range of feminist authors who brought me life.. and salvation... helping me to link to together all the bits and pieces of theology I had been struggling with.
In church, as a result, I began to change the words of the hymns the ministers and worship leaders gave us. I began to evangelise on the subject with some hot arguments. (Sean) One visiting lecturer banned any reference to inclusive language in a music class as I plugged away at it, and kept raising the question. Perhaps I needed some lessons in subtlety, but then it is hard to be subtle and gentle and diplomatic, when only the feelings and `excludedness' of one side of the argument, is ever given validity. In this class, and elsewhere, people who were offended by inclusive language expected immediately to be heeded. Those of us who felt excluded by the traditional language, had to suffer in silence. The validity of our pain and exclusion was never admitted, and still often is not. I began to realise that arguments about language are only one facet, a tip, of much deeper and highly important arguments about the nature of humanity and hierarchy... even about all of reality and how we relate to it. Language is how we know- and the way we know affects everything.
Even before that music class experience I wondered how I would cope in a parish without creating a storm, because I had come to the point where I just couldn't go quietly along with the old words anymore. But then a woman, 78, and the widow of a minister, came up to me over coffee one day after church.
She said, "That was a fine tenor voice behind me in church this morning!" There was something in her tone to hint that compliments were not what was on her mind. "Are you referring to the way I changed the words, Rose," I said, bracing myself. "Yes." She spoke with a passion, taking me completely by surprise: "And I thought it was very good.!"
One of my friends at college, one of the women, said out of the blue one day, "I really appreciate the way you use inclusive language when you lead worship." I began to realise that even if I did offend some people, others were very appreciative it. In fact, those two people, Rose and Christine set me free. Suddenly Careful Language lost its last traces of theory, and became a real and living issue for me. I was converted. And I was comfortable.
When I came to my parish I just used inclusive language, without fuss, and with little explanation. I often change the words of the hymns and put them on overhead projector. Where they're still in copyright, I suggest to people we change them as we sing, and usually they do. And without complaint. I use the hymns of Shirley Murray and Elizabeth Smith, and Brian Wren , with little complaint, and a lot of positive comment. In fact, the only complaint I have had has been about some new tunes, and print being too small on OHP slides. NO ONE has complained about the language.... except that at our Christmas Eve Candle service I heard a sotto voce comment from a visitor that "it used to 'God bless you merry, gentlemen'", which is rather ironic since I'd typed in "God bless you merry, people all" straight out of the Australian Hymn Book!
I have discovered Careful Language is about more than gender. I was going to announce Robin Mann's hymn Walking Down the Road one day when I saw again the two people in wheel chairs in our congregation, who would sit and listen to us sing walking down the road some 30 times during the hymn, and yet never be walking again. Our unfortunate organist was hit with a quick change of hymn! And about the time I was learning that black can also be warm and fecund and nurturing and comforting, not just evil, I saw the hurt in the eyes of a black woman in my congregation as I put evil and black together. I saw the hurt of a group of year music nine students a fellowship group kept calling children even after their teacher specifically told us they didn't like it. Even my nine and five year olds hate being called little in church, but we still persist.
And I see now how much I was excluded by the language of the church. I don't relate to the image of the Father God which we idolise to the exclusion of so many other rich biblical and extra biblical images. God is feminine for me. And it's the feminine, and the females of the church, who have been the major ministers and icons of Christ to me for all of my life.
I remember the imagery and language of the church tradition in which I grew up was almost exclusively from The Gospel to the Romans. I never really felt I could believe or understand it, but I tried to be good and toe the line. All that has been life-giving for me since that time has come from elsewhere, and mostly interpreted Jesus with words and images not from Paul.
I do not believe the church can renew or be renewed when it excludes people by its language and imagery. It can't heal or be healed when it excludes people by its language and imagery. And I cannot communicate my healing, and my little experience of God's vast gracing of us, unless I use language more carefully. The old grammar and the old ways don't work, and I don't want to use them.
Andrew Prior: Careful Language (Written for launch of a Participation of Women document in 1991)
|