There is movement in good worship.
We approach God.
We worship God.
We confess our sins.
We listen to God.
We go out.
We live in the world.
Then we return to the place of worship and withdraw from the world for a while, as the cycle begins again.
This is a good movement. It is a part of a healthy weekly, even daily, cycle. It has a logic of action and reflection, of working and recharging.
It also reflects our understanding of God.
In the traditional understanding of worship, God is approached with care. God is worshipped; God is worthy of our time and attention. No one looks upon the face of God and survives; God holds our life in his hand. This is serious business we are about in the church. God is God.
Once in the right position, the right frame of mind, after the confession of our sins, we listen to God. What is it that God wants? We hear the word of God in the reading of scripture, and in the exposition of preaching. (This may follow other aspects of the worship which were instructional themselves. Many prayers of praise become a vehicle for the preacher long before the formal exposition of the scriptures.)
After hearing the word of God, we respond. We respond with our offerings. We respond in our commitment to acting on the preached word. We respond in our requests of God for others and ourselves, appropriately refined by our re-hearing the word. Then we go out to live the word as the body of Christ in the world, re-energised and re-focussed.
It does not need progressive Christian sensibilities to see how closely this movement of worship is modelled on the royal court. It is how the courtiers enter and act in the presence of the potentate. Although we may not be experts in the ancient middle eastern history where our faith began, we need only watch some TV dramatisation of the life of Henry the Eighth, or similar, to see how much we have projected our treatment of human royalty upon the Divine.
We approach the King with care. He holds our life in his hand. He is like God. Bow down to him; he is worthy of our time and attention. This is serious business we are about in the royal court.
Once in the right position, after the assuring him of our loyalty and love, and apologising for our abject failures, we listen to him. What is his mood today? What does the King want? Already we have been “sniffing the air of the court” as we have bowed and scraped, but what is he saying now? What is his word? We compliment him upon his Wisdom.
After hearing and seeing the actions of the King we respond with our gifts and offerings. We promise our continued loyalty. Now that we understand his mood, we assess what we can ask for wisely, and what we dare not ask.
Then we leave the court, empowered by his blessing and assistance, clear on what he requires of us, and get on with life until we must come back.
How much this is a parody of worship, and how much it actually reflects the way we feel about the Divine, is a measure of how much our worship has progressed! Clearly some people fear God and do their worship in fear and trembling. Others have had some experience of grace, which means their praise has progressed beyond duty and become more adoration. It becomes an act of love rather than obeisance.
In that case worship becomes an act of love, freedom and regeneration. It loses much of its fear, or even its calculated cynicism which seeks favours from God. Think of the power-politicians who seek to manipulate the king through the intrigues of the court, and wonder how much we bargain and argue with the divine, seeking to manipulate a preferred outcome in our lives. Is this movement not at the root of much prosperity theology?
At its best, Sunday worship is a wonderful thing. It refocuses us on the things we believe to be most important. It re-minds us of what we have committed ourselves to living out. It gives us time away from the rush of life, time to refocus and reconsider. It may give us a time and place to re-enter the deeper realities of existence. It re-arms us against the things we consider peripheral, or unhelpful, or even evil, but with which we live in close contact all the week.
Worship is a profound acting out of life. It takes what we know, what we hope, what we fear, what we yearn for and ritually knits us together into a unity. We act out oneness even though we are fractured and contradictory in our being. Worship is profoundly important. In worship, we are "messing with our heads," as the saying goes, and should mess carefully!
People are well aware that worship has projected the less than enlightened politics and egoism of the royal court onto the Divine. They continue to worship because despite its somewhat inglorious pedigree, worship can be a powerful ritual for good. It helps us integrate life. it heals the wounds and tears in our being, and knits together the fractures.
Part of that integration also includes theological reflection. True worship “takes what we know” in the sense that it seeks to integrate our intellectual knowledge and reflection with our emotional and spiritual selves. If worship does not do this, it has a fundamental, bisecting fault line. It has a compartmentalised, dis-integrated flaw. Worship may seek to take us into a deeper reality beyond our ability to neatly articulate. It may seek to allow us to apprehend or begin to perceive something, beyond what we can comprehend or fully understand. This is not the same as compartmentalising. It is not the same as contradicting one reality with the other, and making no attempt to heal the breach. Worship is a flawed methodology if we use it to deal with problems raised by our intellect: Vosper suggests the Liturgical Movement was a kind of distraction, even an excuse, which allowed the church to avoid dealing with the implications of its theological discoveries. (With or Without God pp 107)
When we seek to integrate our theology with our worship, there are some sharp, tearing questions.
Leif the Lucky Bridge is the bridge between continents. It is in the Reykjanes peninsula, southwest Iceland, across the Alfagja rift valley, the boundary of the Eurasian and North American continental tectonic plates. (Attribution and full size image.)
The point of all this is not so much to argue for any particular theology of worship, as to stimulate some questioning. How much does our worship reflect and reinforce our theology, and how much does it contradict our theology? Theology is our view of the world, it is how we understand things. Are we seeking to worship in a way which is congruent with that, or are we in contradiction? Habitually engaging in worship which contradicts our theology is taking a path to breakdown. The breakdown may be an abandonment of our theology, or it may be an abandonment of our church, or a spiral into depression or worse.
Secondly, the purpose of this page is to provide an insights into why worship is often so profoundly distressing, or so deeply repugnant. In fact, many progressive Christians are probably well aware of the deep contradiction which splits their worship life. This page seeks to provide validation. We should feel torn apart. If we are not noticing the disparity between the traditional Sunday practice of worship and the theology with which we are learning to think, we have not thought very much at all!
I have been using the metaphor of the fault line, the place of stress and fracture in our thinking. It takes little reflection to wonder if the metaphor of the rift might not be appropriate, for often on Sunday mornings two plates of our existence are being torn apart. Intellect and liturgy seem to be continents journeying in different directions.
Would you like to comment?
I have turned off the feedback module due to constant spamming. However, if you would like to comment, or discuss a post, you are welcome to email me using the link at the bottom of this page, and I may include your comments at the bottom of this article.